Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42306211›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2026

Companion animals support human wellbeing and health: evolutionary, behavioral and physiological contexts.

Kurt Kotrschal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kurt KotrschalDepartment of Behavioral Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review deals with the questions why humans want to live with other animals and how this is at all possible. In fact, it has become common sense that living and working with companion animals entails major benefits for human wellbeing and health, albeit with the caveat that the positive experience of private keepers and practitioners in pedagogy and therapy is not always backed by scientific scrutiny. The present focus is on relevant aspects of the "Darwinian continuum," which provides humans and other animals with a shared social toolbox, including brain, physiology and behavioral organization. It is discussed why domesticated animals are particularly suitable companions, why dogs are a special case, and why anthropomorphizing other animals may be as much an asset as a burden. In fact, living with companion animals is a human universal, which seems basically motivated by biophilia (the human-typical interest in nature and animals), and by striving for social homoeostasis (for social contexts supporting wellbeing and health). Between-species socializing is possible because of common phylogeny and functional convergence, resulting in matching social mindsets and behavioral systems. It is based on shared principles of behavioral organization, of thinking and decision making, on shared neuronal, physiological and psychological mechanisms, on virtually identical basic affects, and on the shared stress and calming systems. Finally, the social toolbox shared between humans and other animals also suggests a relatively moderate socio-cognitive gap between humans and other animals.

Indexed as

animal-assisted activitiesanimal-assisted pedagogyanimal-assisted therapybiophiliadogdomesticationhuman-animal relationssocial homoeostasis

Identifiers

PMID42306211
PMCPMC13265477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.