ArticleHealth science reports2026
Congenital Genitourinary Anomaly Identification and Referral in Rural Nepal: A Qualitative Study on the Perspective of Female Community Health Volunteers.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Delayed presentation of congenital anomalies is common in Nepal, highlighting the importance of timely diagnosis. Female community health volunteers (FCHVs), who are integral to health care delivery in communities, may offer an opportunity for early identification and referral of these anomalies. This study explored the perceptions, willingness, and motivations of FCHVs in Nepal regarding their potential role in the identification of congenital external genitourinary (GU) anomalies. Methods: Twelve FCHVs from Devdaha municipality, Rupandehi district, Nepal, participated in a focus group discussion (FGD). FCHVs were purposively sampled to ensure diversity in geographic setting (urban/rural), age, and years of experience. A semi-structured FGD guide was used to explore knowledge, attitudes, perceived community acceptance, and recommendations for future training. Data was analyzed using inductive thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke's framework. Results: Five key themes emerged: (1) lack of confidence in identifying and refering congenital GU anomalies, (2) positive attitude toward community-based screening, (3) perceived barriers (e.g., stigma and parental resistance) and facilitators (e.g., existing child health roles), (4) recommendations for practical, skill-based training, and (5) motivation for FCHVs' work. While FCHVs recognized the importance of identifying congenital anomalies and associated risks or complications, most lacked confidence due to limited prior training. Most FCHVs expressed willingness to participate in screening, particularly when they perceived the role as aligned with their existing responsibilities. There was consensus on the need for targeted training before implementing a formal program. Conclusion: This study provides early evidence on the feasibility of integrating congenital anomaly screening into community health systems, highlighting training and referral strengthening as next potential steps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.