Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42306126›Full record

ArticleNeurology. Education2026

Adapting Neurology Residency: A Case Study and Practical Guide for Accommodations for a Disabled Resident.

Thomas John Pisano, Laura A Stein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology. Education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thomas John PisanoFrom the Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8432-113X
Laura A SteinFrom the Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5916-7679

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurologists with disabilities remain underrepresented in the US physician workforce despite decades of legal protections mandating accommodation. Although the Americans with Disabilities Act provides a statutory framework, graduate medical education programs frequently lack structured, operational processes to implement accommodations in residency training. In this case study, a neurology program director and resident-both physicians with spinal cord injuries-describe how they adapted a neurology residency to support equivalent training while preserving educational rigor and patient safety. Before residency began, they identified accessible clinical sites, designed equivalent rotations to preserve educational rigor, and conducted audits of key clinical spaces. When environmental or scheduling demands exceeded feasible modification, they implemented alternative solutions that ensured the resident's educational exposure remained on par with nondisabled peers. Unanticipated barriers-including security policy changes and environmental hazards-further refined a structured workflow emphasizing early engagement, environmental review, and iterative reassessment. This experience informed development of a practical, replicable framework and accompanying Practical Guide. By documenting both anticipated and unforeseen barriers, this case illustrates how neurology training can evolve from ad hoc accommodation toward proactive institutional design that aligns inclusion with educational excellence.

Identifiers

PMID42306126
PMCPMC13268656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.