ReviewLe infezioni in medicina2026
Nipah virus infection: what clinicians need to know.
Review in Le infezioni in medicina, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nipah virus infection is an uncommon but highly lethal zoonotic illness that primarily presents with acute encephalitis and respiratory disease in humans. After its initial identification during the Malaysia-Singapore outbreak of 1998-1999, human outbreaks have since been reported in Bangladesh and India. Despite the relatively small number of reported cases, the Nipah virus remains a major clinical and public health concern because of its high mortality, capacity for person-to-person transmission, lack of approved antiviral treatment, and potential for amplification within healthcare settings. For clinicians, the major challenge lies in early recognition of a disease that initially presents with nonspecific febrile symptoms but may rapidly progress to severe encephalitis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, or both. Human-to-human transmission has been well documented in South Asian outbreaks, particularly in household and healthcare settings, underscoring the importance of prompt isolation and infection prevention measures. Laboratory confirmation relies primarily on reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, with serology providing supportive evidence later in the course of illness. Management remains largely supportive, with intensive care often required in severe cases. This review provides a practical clinician-oriented overview of Nipah virus infection, focusing on epidemiology relevant to frontline practice, clinical presentation, transmission, diagnostic approach, infection control, treatment, prognosis, and outbreak response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.