ArticleFrontiers in genetics2026
MetaComb: a meta-learning framework for drug combination response prediction from cell lines to patients.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- PKIDB-informed molecular profiling improves reproducible prediction of cancer kinase-inhibitor response.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Combination therapy has emerged as a pivotal strategy in oncology to enhance efficacy and overcome drug resistance. Computational prediction models of drug combinations trained on abundant cell line data provide a starting point, but their applicability to patients remains constrained by inherent biological disparities between cultured cell lines and patient-derived tumors. However, due to ethical and cost issues, patient-derived datasets remain scarce, thus, developing patient-level predictive algorithms must explicitly confront the few-shot problem of relevant data. Method: To break through the small sample bottleneck, we used the Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning (MAML) to develop a Meta-Learning Drug Combination Response Prediction (MetaComb) method for patient Results: MetaComb outperformed conventional transfer learning in predicting drug combination response, improving AUROC by 8.5% for data-poor cell lines and by 7.4% for patient ex vivo samples. And for the patients with Discussion: This study, as a proof-of-concept, provided an initial evidence that the MetaComb meta-learning framework is feasible for patient-derived
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.