ArticleFrontiers in genetics2026
Accuracy of genomic prediction for milk production traits in Mehsana buffalo.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Genomic information can contribute significantly to the increase in the accuracy of genetic evaluation compared to relying solely on pedigree relationships. Hence, the objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of genomic prediction for 305 days milk yield (305DMY), 305 days fat yield (305DFY), 305 days solid-not-fat yield (305DSNFY) and 305 days protein yield (305DPY) traits in Mehsana buffalo using pedigree best linear unbiased prediction (PBLUP) and single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) models. Prediction bias was assessed by estimating the regression coefficient of corrected yield (Yc) on predicted breeding values (BVs). Methods: The phenotype dataset comprised of test day records of 10,897 Mehsana buffalo for milk yield, 10,896 for fat yield, 10,581 for SNF yield and 10,578 for protein yield were used for present study. A total of 4,107 blood samples of Mehsana buffaloes were collected and genotyped using BUFFCHIP 54K SNP array. After the quality control, final dataset comprised of 3,887 Mehsana buffalo with 53,292 SNPs. Results: The prediction accuracies obtained using PBLUP ranged from 0.078 to 0.088, whereas those from ssGBLUP ranged from 0.088 to 0.100. The average predictive accuracies across traits were 0.083 for PBLUP and 0.093 for ssGBLUP, representing an overall improvement of 11.37% with ssGBLUP. The regression coefficients of predictions ranged from 0.44 to 0.52 for PBLUP and from 0.45 to 0.61 for ssGBLUP across production traits. The average regression coefficients were 0.48 for PBLUP and 0.53 for ssGBLUP, indicating reduced prediction bias under the ssGBLUP model. Conclusion: ssGBLUP provides more accurate and less biased breeding value predictions than PBLUP for production traits in Mehsana buffaloes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.