ArticleJTCVS structural and endovascular2025
Comparative midterm results of surgical mitral valve replacement and transcatheter mitral valve replacement with the Tendyne System.
Article in JTCVS structural and endovascular, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the midterm clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of high-risk patients who underwent surgical mitral valve replacement (SMVR) or transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) with the Tendyne System in a single-center setting. Methods: The study included all consecutive high-risk patients who underwent TMVR or SMVR at the University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy, between March 2018 and December 2023. The primary outcome was cardiovascular (CV) mortality at follow-up (FU), whereas secondary outcomes were overall mortality and rehospitalization for heart failure at FU. Results: We included 30 patients who underwent TMVR and 50 who underwent SMVR. Although the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II and Society of Thoracic Surgeons scores were similar, patients who underwent TMVR were older and had worse renal function and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, 41.80 ± 13% and 56.89 ± 10.23%). The 30-day CV mortality was lower in the TMVR group ( Conclusions: SMVR and TMVR showed similar early and midterm clinical and echocardiographic outcomes in a high-risk population. However, TMVR resulted in a lower postoperative complication rate and faster recovery. Therefore, TMVR might be a possible alternative to surgery for selected high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.