ArticleTurkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation2026
Efficacy of mesotherapy in patients with acute and subacute neck pain: A randomized controlled trial.
Article in Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of mesotherapy in patients with acute or subacute neck pain compared to oral medications with the same active ingredients. Patients and methods: In this randomized, single-blind study, 44 patients with acute to subacute neck pain (6 males, 38 females; mean age: 46.8±11.1 years; range, 23 to 65 years) were included between October 30, 2023, and June 30, 2024. These patients were randomly assigned to two groups. The first group received two sessions of mesotherapy solution, administered at seven‑day intervals. The second group received oral meloxicam 15 mg once daily and thiocolchicoside 8 mg twice daily for seven days. Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and cervical range of motion were evaluated before treatment and on the seventh and 14 Results: There was no significant difference in demographic data, initial VAS scores, range of motion, and NDI scores between the two groups (p>0.05). Significant improvements in the VAS (p<0.001 and p<0.03, respectively) and NDI scores (p<0.001 and p=0.016, respectively) were observed within both groups. However, there was no significant difference between the groups (p>0.05). No significant difference was found within or between the groups in range of motion (p>0.05). In the first group, VAS scores significantly improved 30 mins after both sessions (p=0.009 and p=0.038, respectively). Conclusion: We found mesotherapy to be as effective as oral combination therapy. Mesotherapy can be preferred as it allows the use of low-dose medication to relieve acute and subacute neck pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.