Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42305991›Full record

ArticleJTCVS structural and endovascular2024

Initial experience with transcatheter aortic valve replacement before and after lung transplant.

Mujtaba Mubashir, John O Barron, Samir Kapadia, Amar Krishnaswamy, Shinya Unai, Kenneth McCurry, Marie Budev, Grant Reed, Rishi Puri, Haytham Elgharably and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTCVS structural and endovascular, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mujtaba MubashirDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
John O BarronDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Samir KapadiaDepartment of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Amar KrishnaswamyDepartment of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Shinya UnaiDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Kenneth McCurryDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Marie BudevDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Grant ReedDepartment of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Rishi PuriDepartment of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Haytham ElgharablyDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Usman AhmadDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
James YunDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Patients with end-stage lung disease and lung transplant (LTx) recipients are high-risk candidates for surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR). Transcatheter AVR (TAVR) is an established treatment for aortic stenosis. Experience with TAVR in the LTx population is limited. We sought to report our experience in patients who underwent TAVR before or after LTx. Methods: Single-center, retrospective analysis, including all patients who underwent TAVR pre- or post-LTx from 2000 to 2020. Indications, mode of anesthesia, timing of TAVR, and procedural outcomes were reviewed. Results: In total, 10 LTx patients underwent TAVR. Aortic stenosis was the indication for TAVR in all patients: 5 had TAVR pre-LTx, and 5 post-LTx. All 10 TAVRs were performed with transfemoral access, and 9 out of 10 with intravenous sedation and monitored anesthesia care; only 1 required general anesthesia. In the TAVR pre-LTx group, mean age was 62 years and 4 patients were men. Four TAVR valves were balloon-expandable and 1 self-expanding. Median time from TAVR to transplant was 7.4 months (range, 1.7-36 months), and median length of stay after TAVR 4 days (range, 2-36 days). The only TAVR-related complication was a pacemaker for heart block (1 out of 5). All 5 subsequently underwent successful double LTx (1 with concurrent liver transplant). In the TAVR post-LTx group, mean age was 66 years and 2 patients were men. Four TAVR valves were balloon-expandable and 1 was self-expanding. Median time from LTx to TAVR was 5 years (range, 2.6-7.6 years), and median length of stay post-TAVR was 2 days (range, 1-17 days). The only TAVR-related complication in this group was heart block requiring pacemaker (1 out of 5). In both groups, there were no intraprocedural mortalities or conversions to surgical AVR. No patients required post-TAVR surgical intervention during study follow-up. Conclusions: Our initial experience suggests that TAVR is safe and feasible for treatment of aortic stenosis in patients with end-stage lung disease awaiting LTx, and in patients who have undergone LTx. Overall TAVR-related complications included need for pacemaker. TAVR should be considered for treatment of aortic stenosis in patients with end-stage lung disease awaiting transplant, and for post-LTx patients as an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement.

Indexed as

aortic valvelung transplantTAVRtranscatheter aortic valve

Identifiers

PMID42305991
PMCPMC13244692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.