ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
An explainable machine learning model for prognosis prediction in sudden sensorineural hearing loss under integrated therapy.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An Explainable Machine Learning Framework for Predicting Hearing Aid Satisfaction: Integrating the HATASS Instrument and Clinical Insights.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) is a common otologic emergency with variable prognosis. Reliable prognostic tools, particularly for patients undergoing integrated therapy, remain scarce. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 227 patients with unilateral SSNHL of the Qi stagnation and blood stasis syndrome who received standardized integrated therapy. Patients were partitioned into training (70%) and validation (30%) sets via outcome-based stratified sampling. To prevent information leakage, all preprocessing and feature selection were conducted strictly within the training set. Eight machine learning models were optimized through five-fold cross-validation (primary metric: AUC). Model performance was systematically evaluated across discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility, with SHapley Additive ExPlanations (SHAP) analysis applied to quantify interpretability and identify key prognostic predictors. Results: The XGBoost model demonstrated superior performance in the validation set (AUC: 0.718; 95% CI: 0.590-0.846), with robust calibration and positive clinical net benefit. SHAP analysis identified four key predictors: activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), disease duration, platelet count (PLT), and total protein (TP). Non-linear interpretability revealed distinct prognostic thresholds: a critical intervention window was identified within 10 days of symptom onset; optimal recovery was associated with PLT counts of 200-250 × 10 Conclusion: This study developed an explainable XGBoost-based model, providing an initial framework for prognostic prediction in SSNHL patients. It demonstrates the integration of machine learning with TCM-informed therapy, suggesting potential pathways for personalized care. While promising, the results should be interpreted with caution due to the lack of external validation. Further multicenter prospective studies are crucial to confirm the model's generalizability and validate the identified biological predictors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.