ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
The efficacy and safety of iguratimod treatment in stable systemic lupus erythematosus: a preliminary prospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of iguratimod as maintenance therapy in patients with stable systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods: Eligible participants were adults with stable SLE (SLEDAI-2K ≤4 for ≥12 weeks) and on stable standard-of-care medication. Patients treated with iguratimod (iguratimod group) were matched to those not receiving iguratimod (control group) using prospectively frequency matching at a 1:2 ratio. The coprimary end points were the flare rate at week 52 and the time to first flare. Results: This prospective cohort study consecutively screened 220 patients, of whom 52 meeting the inclusion criteria were enrolled. The final analysis included 16 patients in the iguratimod group and 31 in the control group. In the coprimary analysis, The flare rates at week 52 were 37.5% in the iguratimod group and 29% in the control group. Iguratimod was associated with a non-significant, numerically higher relapse risk versus control (HR = 1.45, 95% CI 0.57 to 3.74), with sensitivity analyses confirming the direction of this trend. No significant between-group differences were observed in the changes of secondary endpoints. Regarding safety, iguratimod was well-tolerated, and no serious adverse events were reported. Conclusion: This cohort study of 52 stable SLE patients found that the 52-week flare risk did not differ significantly between those exposed to iguratimod and those who were not. However, these null findings should be interpreted with caution and are not evidence of equivalence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.