ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
High-fidelity simulation in airway management training: results from the AIR-MASTER-SIM randomised study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Airway management is a key competency in emergency medicine and critical care, and effective training in endotracheal intubation is essential during undergraduate medical education. Direct laryngoscopy has traditionally been considered the standard technique for airway access, although it can present technical difficulties for inexperienced operators. Videolaryngoscopy provides indirect visualisation of the glottis and may facilitate airway management during the early stages of training. This study compared the acquisition of airway management skills among medical students trained using direct laryngoscopy or videolaryngoscopy in a simulation-based educational environment. Methods: A prospective, randomised, comparative simulation-based study was conducted among fourth-year medical students at the University of Granada (Spain). Participants were assigned to direct laryngoscopy or videolaryngoscopy training. Training and assessment were conducted in a high-fidelity clinical simulation environment using standardised scenarios designed to assess cognitive, procedural and attitudinal competencies related to airway management. The main outcomes included the intubation success rate, the time required to achieve airway access, the number of attempts required to achieve successful intubation and the occurrence of procedure-related complications. Perceived stress and perceived control of procedure time during the simulation scenario were also recorded. Results: A total of 305 medical students participated in the study, including 152 in the direct laryngoscopy group and 153 in the videolaryngoscopy group. Airway access was achieved in 98.0% of students trained with videolaryngoscopy compared to 7.9% of those trained with direct laryngoscopy. Videolaryngoscopy was associated with fewer attempts required to achieve successful intubation, shorter procedure time and fewer procedure-related complications. Trainees trained with videolaryngoscopy also reported greater perceived control of procedure time and lower levels of stress during the simulation scenario. Conclusion: Videolaryngoscopy facilitated the acquisition of airway management skills during the early stages of medical training. The improved view of airway structures and the possibility of shared visualisation between instructors and trainees may partly explain the better procedural performance observed in the simulation setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.