Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42305950›Full record

ArticleAI in precision oncology

Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Oncology: Promises, Pitfalls, and Early Applications.

Nikhil G Thaker, Wei Liu, Mark Waddle, Timothy Showalter, Federico Mastroleo, Join Luh, Chad Levitt, Matthew Ning, Arturo Loaiza-Bonilla, Julian Hong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AI in precision oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nikhil G ThakerBayta Systems, Newtown, Pennsylvania, USA.
Wei LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Mark WaddleDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Timothy ShowalterUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Federico MastroleoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Join LuhProvidence St Joseph Health System, Eureka, California, USA.
Chad LevittONCareMD, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Matthew NingUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Arturo Loaiza-BonillaDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, St Luke's University Health NetworK, Allentown, Pennsylvania, USA.
Julian HongUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.

Funding

Dose Linear Energy Transfer Volume Histogram and Dosimetric Seed Spot Analysis in Spot Scanning Proton TherapyR01CA280134 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA · PI Wei Liu · 2024 to 2026
$1.7M
Online Adaptive Proton TherapyR01EB293388 · NIBIB · MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA · PI Wei Liu · 2025 to 2026
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA280134NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB293388
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is rapidly emerging as a transformative paradigm for large language models (LLMs), especially in high-stakes domains like oncology that demand precision, factual grounding, and up-to-date knowledge. By pairing LLMs with external knowledge repositories, RAG systems explicitly ground model outputs in relevant retrieved documents, helping to reduce hallucinations and ensure responses reflect current evidence. In oncology, where clinical knowledge evolves continually with new research and drug approvals, RAG offers a way to integrate the latest data (e.g., trial results, guidelines, genomic databases) into decision-making. This review synthesizes the technical foundations of RAG, including its architecture and key components, and examines current applications in oncology such as clinical decision support, patient education, radiology reporting, pathology analysis, and genomics-driven precision medicine. We highlight recent studies that demonstrate RAG's potential-for instance, improving treatment recommendations by incorporating genetic profiles and literature, and enhancing diagnostic accuracy by integrating guidelines. We also discuss emerging developments like multimodal RAG (combining text with imaging or other data), ensemble model approaches, and new explainability tools that trace model outputs to sources. Finally, we critically analyze the limitations and challenges of deploying RAG in healthcare, including computational costs, retrieval errors, noise or conflicts in retrieved information, and ethical and regulatory considerations. While RAG-based systems show promise in augmenting oncologists' expertise with timely knowledge, careful implementation, high-quality curation of knowledge bases, and human oversight will be crucial for safe and effective adoption in clinical practice.

Indexed as

decision supportethical and regulatory issues in AImachine learning in researchtreatment planning

Identifiers

PMID42305950
PMCPMC13267935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.