ArticleAsian biomedicine : research, reviews and news2026
Best evidence for fluid resuscitation nursing in hypovolemic shock patients in emergency care based on GRADE system.
Article in Asian biomedicine : research, reviews and news, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hypovolemic shock is a life-threatening condition frequently encountered in emergency care, resulting from significant blood or fluid loss that impairs oxygen delivery to vital organs. Common causes include trauma, surgery, gastrointestinal bleeding, and ruptured ectopic pregnancy. Prompt fluid resuscitation is critical, with nurses playing a central role in early recognition, timely intervention, and continuous monitoring. Objective: To synthesise the best evidence for fluid resuscitation practices in hypovolemic shock and assess nursing knowledge and practice in emergency settings. Methods: This systematic review was conducted using preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and metaanalyses (PRISMA) guidelines and evaluated through the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) system. Databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies published between 2015 and 2024. Results: The isotonic crystalloids are the preferred first-line therapy, with early goal-directed fluid administration and close patient monitoring improving outcomes. Nurse-led assessment and reassessment were key to guiding resuscitation and reducing complications. However, gaps in protocol adherence, documentation, and practice variation were identified. Knowledge deficits among nurses were also evident, highlighting the need for targeted training. Conclusions: This review supports the development of a structured nursing guideline for managing hypovolemic shock, emphasising evidence-based fluid strategies and continuous clinical evaluation. Strengthening nursing competencies through education and standardised protocols can enhance emergency care delivery and patient survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.