Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42305852›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2026

Feasibility of omitting regional nodal irradiation in cT1-2N1 breast cancer with ypN1 disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (KROG 21-06).

Younghee Park, Kyubo Kim, Kyung Hwan Shin, Ji Hyun Chang, Su Ssan Kim, Jin Hong Jung, Won Park, Haeyoung Kim, Yong Bae Kim, Sung Ja Ahn and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Younghee ParkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, the Republic of Korea.
Kyubo KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, the Republic of Korea.
Kyung Hwan ShinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, the Republic of Korea.
Ji Hyun ChangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, the Republic of Korea.
Su Ssan KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, the Republic of Korea.
Jin Hong JungDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, the Republic of Korea.
Won ParkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, the Republic of Korea.
Haeyoung KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, the Republic of Korea.
Yong Bae KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, the Republic of Korea.
Sung Ja AhnDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, the Republic of Korea.
Myungsoo KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, the Republic of Korea.
Jin Hee KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, the Republic of Korea.
Hyejung ChaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, the Republic of Korea.
Tae Gyu KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, the Republic of Korea.
Hae Jin ParkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, the Republic of Korea.
Sun Young LeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Jeonbuk National University School of Medicine, Jeonju, the Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of regional nodal irradiation (RNI) in breast cancer patients with 1-3 residual nodal metastases (ypN1) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of breast cancer patients with clinical T1-2N1 disease who received NAC followed by surgery and postoperative radiotherapy between 2005 and 2017. Patients with 1-3 pathologically positive lymph nodes (ypN1) after axillary dissection were included. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the prognostic factors for locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: The median follow-up duration was 88.9 months (range, 5.0-200.1). A total of 245 patients were included and RNI was administered in 84.5% (n = 207). Lymphatic invasion and extranodal extension were more frequent in patients who received RNI compared with those who did not ( Conclusion: RNI was not associated with additional survival benefit in cT1-2N1 breast cancer patients with ypN1 disease after NAC. These findings warrant further validation.

Indexed as

Breast cancerNeoadjuvant chemotherapyRegional nodal irradiation

Identifiers

PMID42305852
PMCPMC13266224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.