SynthesisFrontiers in psychiatry2026
The efficacy of acupuncture for depression-associated chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The comorbidity of pain and depression is prevalent, adding difficulty to the treatment of depression. This systematic review with meta-analysis aims to determine the efficacy and safety of acupuncture in treating depression-associated chronic pain (DACP). Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across four international databases, namely PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, along with four regional databases, including Wanfang Data, CNKI, VIP database, and SinoMed, from inception to March 2025. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool was utilized to assess risk of bias in the included research articles, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluations system was employed to evaluate the certainty of evidence. Meta-regression analysis was performed to explore the influence of patient age and treatment duration on the study results, and sensitivity analysis was used to verify the stability of the results. The publication bias was evaluated when the number of included studies exceeded ten. All data analyses were completed using Stata15.1. Results: Ten randomized controlled trials involving 761 participants were included. Acupuncture combined with conventional medications was more effective than medication alone in improving depressive symptoms (standardized mean difference (SMD): -0.72; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.91 to -0.53; Conclusions: Acupuncture appears to have comparable antidepressant and analgesic effects to conventional oral medications. When applied as an adjuvant therapy, acupuncture may enhance the clinical efficacy of monotherapy for DACP. Regarding treatment duration, a 4-week acupuncture intervention may be superior to a longer cycle (> 4 weeks) in alleviating depressive symptoms, while long-term acupuncture treatment may provide greater benefits in analgesia. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier CRD420251026454.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.