Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42305839›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sociology2026

Social innovation in education: perspectives from Brazil and Mexico.

Karina Maldonado-Mariscal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Karina Maldonado-MariscalSocial Research Center (sfs), TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social innovation in education remains under-researched despite its growing importance in addressing educational challenges in Latin America. Whilst innovation in education can encompass systemic reforms or incremental classroom changes, social innovation specifically involves novel partnerships, institutions, methods, and collaborative arrangements amongst communities, schools, local governments, and non-governmental organizations, emphasizing societal participation through co-creation processes. This paper addresses the research question: How do social actors construct and sustain social innovations in education through networks, partnerships, and community participation? Drawing on fieldwork conducted in Brazil and Mexico between 2013 and 2014 and a follow-up interview in 2023, this study employs case study methodology examining three long-standing educational innovations: City School-Apprentice and Campos Salles School in São Paulo, Brazil, and the Institute of Educational Innovation in Chiapas, Mexico. The analysis suggests that, in the cases examined, social innovations emerged through iterative processes involving collective action, sustained relationship-building, and collaborative governance at the micro level. The findings show how locally rooted networks developed connections to wider institutional structures, under conditions that varied considerably between the two national contexts. The paper's primary contribution lies in offering an empirically grounded sociological account of social innovation in education in two contrasting Latin American contexts. This study shows the influence of diverse stakeholders on the implementation of educational innovations in environments with limited resources. It also emphasizes the transformative potential of grassroots innovation, civil society involvement, and community-centred approaches to educational change in Latin America.

Indexed as

Brazilcommunity participationeducationgrassroots innovationLatin AmericaMexicosocial innovationsocial transformation

Identifiers

PMID42305839
PMCPMC13265306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.