Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42305836›Full record

ArticleJTCVS structural and endovascular2024

A novel, simplified protected Ross technique: The "Seattle shawl" procedure.

Christopher R Burke, David Mauchley, Scott DeRoo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTCVS structural and endovascular, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Protected Ross technique.JTCVS techniques · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christopher R BurkeDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash.
David MauchleyDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Wash.
Scott DeRooDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Autograft dilation and subsequent aortic regurgitation remain a challenge in the long term after the Ross procedure in adults. We have developed a novel technique for a modified Dacron wrap of the pulmonary autograft to help stabilize and mitigate this issue. Methods: In 2022, we formalized a patient-specific tailored algorithm for autograft protection during the Ross procedure, including use of a modified Dacron wrap ("Seattle shawl"). This technique involves the use of a Valsalva graft, which is "keyholed" to facilitate coronary button implantation on the autograft and then wrapped around the pulmonary autograft. A total of 6 patients have undergone the Seattle shawl procedure. Mean follow-up time was 11.8 months (range, 4-17 months). Results: All 6 patients had bicuspid aortic valves with severe aortic regurgitation. Mean aortic annulus size was 30.3 mm, and mean aortic root diameter was 4.4 cm. There were no perioperative strokes, reinterventions, or mortalities. All patients had mild or less aortic regurgitation on the most recent echocardiogram. Aortic root diameters were between 3.2 and 3.9 cm on the most recent imaging examination. There were no mortalities or complications observed during the follow-up period. Conclusions: Pulmonary autograft dilation remains a challenge postoperatively after the Ross procedure in adults. Multiple interventions have been used to minimize this phenomenon. These include technical modifications such as annuloplasty rings or complete inclusion of the autograft within a Dacron graft. We present a novel, straightforward technique for autograft protection using a modified Valsalva graft. Early outcomes in 6 patients appear promising with this technique.

Indexed as

aortic valveRoss proceduresurgical technique

Identifiers

PMID42305836
PMCPMC13244721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.