Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42305811›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026

Efficacy of stem cell therapy for achilles tendon rupture: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on animal studies.

Bingbing Li, Xiaoyan Wang, Jian Ma, Dong Hu, Liang Liu, Jun Lu, Taichao Ren

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bingbing LiDepartment of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Honghui Hospital Affiliated to Xi' an Jiaotong University, Xi'An, Shaanxi, China.
Xiaoyan WangHospital of Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'An, Shaanxi, China.
Jian MaDepartment of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Honghui Hospital Affiliated to Xi' an Jiaotong University, Xi'An, Shaanxi, China.
Dong HuDepartment of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Honghui Hospital Affiliated to Xi' an Jiaotong University, Xi'An, Shaanxi, China.
Liang LiuDepartment of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Honghui Hospital Affiliated to Xi' an Jiaotong University, Xi'An, Shaanxi, China.
Jun LuDepartment of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Honghui Hospital Affiliated to Xi' an Jiaotong University, Xi'An, Shaanxi, China.
Taichao RenDepartment of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Honghui Hospital Affiliated to Xi' an Jiaotong University, Xi'An, Shaanxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although stem cell-based therapies show promise for promoting Achilles tendon regeneration, the current preclinical evidence is highly heterogeneous, and their overall efficacy and key modifying factors remain unclear. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus for studies based on rat models of Achilles tendon rupture. Two investigators independently performed study selection, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment. Meta-analyses were conducted using R software. Results: Twenty-seven studies were included. Pooled analyses showed that stem cell transplantation significantly improved ultimate load and histological scores of the Achilles tendon, with effects increasing over time. However, the impact of stem cell therapy on tendon stiffness was limited. For type I collagen, stem cell transplantation alone did not significantly enhance its expression, whereas combining stem cells with biomaterial scaffolds led to a marked increase. Subgroup analyses revealed a complex relationship between stem cell dose and treatment efficacy: for ultimate load, a moderate dose was effective at 2 weeks, while a high dose was more effective at 4 weeks; for histological scores, both low and moderate doses were effective at 2 weeks, whereas only moderate-to-high doses were effective at 4 weeks, indicating a nonlinear and time-dependent dose-response pattern. Overall, composite strategies using scaffold-loaded stem cells were generally more effective than scaffold treatment alone. Assessment of publication bias suggested potential bias in the primary outcomes, but trim-and-fill correction did not materially alter the conclusions. Risk-of-bias evaluation showed generally inadequate reporting in key methodological domains, including random sequence generation, allocation concealment, and blinding, indicating a potential risk of bias. Conclusion: Stem cell transplantation can effectively improve the biomechanical strength and histological architecture of the Achilles tendon after rupture, but its effects on stiffness restoration and type I collagen expression appear limited. Based on early healing data from rat models, scaffold-loaded stem cell therapy shows potential for enhancing Achilles tendon repair. However, the current preclinical literature is characterized by methodological shortcomings and marked heterogeneity in critical factors such as stem cell sources and scaffold materials. As a result, the findings primarily reflect overall trends rather than definitive effects, and clinical translation will require further standardized studies and validation in large animal models.

Indexed as

achilles tendon ruptureanimal studiesbiomaterialsmeta-analysisstem cells

Identifiers

PMID42305811
PMCPMC13265556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.