SynthesisFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
Efficacy of stem cell therapy for achilles tendon rupture: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on animal studies.
Synthesis in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although stem cell-based therapies show promise for promoting Achilles tendon regeneration, the current preclinical evidence is highly heterogeneous, and their overall efficacy and key modifying factors remain unclear. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus for studies based on rat models of Achilles tendon rupture. Two investigators independently performed study selection, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment. Meta-analyses were conducted using R software. Results: Twenty-seven studies were included. Pooled analyses showed that stem cell transplantation significantly improved ultimate load and histological scores of the Achilles tendon, with effects increasing over time. However, the impact of stem cell therapy on tendon stiffness was limited. For type I collagen, stem cell transplantation alone did not significantly enhance its expression, whereas combining stem cells with biomaterial scaffolds led to a marked increase. Subgroup analyses revealed a complex relationship between stem cell dose and treatment efficacy: for ultimate load, a moderate dose was effective at 2 weeks, while a high dose was more effective at 4 weeks; for histological scores, both low and moderate doses were effective at 2 weeks, whereas only moderate-to-high doses were effective at 4 weeks, indicating a nonlinear and time-dependent dose-response pattern. Overall, composite strategies using scaffold-loaded stem cells were generally more effective than scaffold treatment alone. Assessment of publication bias suggested potential bias in the primary outcomes, but trim-and-fill correction did not materially alter the conclusions. Risk-of-bias evaluation showed generally inadequate reporting in key methodological domains, including random sequence generation, allocation concealment, and blinding, indicating a potential risk of bias. Conclusion: Stem cell transplantation can effectively improve the biomechanical strength and histological architecture of the Achilles tendon after rupture, but its effects on stiffness restoration and type I collagen expression appear limited. Based on early healing data from rat models, scaffold-loaded stem cell therapy shows potential for enhancing Achilles tendon repair. However, the current preclinical literature is characterized by methodological shortcomings and marked heterogeneity in critical factors such as stem cell sources and scaffold materials. As a result, the findings primarily reflect overall trends rather than definitive effects, and clinical translation will require further standardized studies and validation in large animal models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.