ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026
Evaluating reliability of automated quantitative brain morphometry from fetal T2-weighted MRI.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Three-dimensional assessment of fetal cortical morphology from MRI is essential for understanding early brain neurodevelopment. However, measurement can be affected by fetal imaging quality, number and selection of available stacks, and reconstruction methods. Methods: We evaluated the within-session reliability of an automated cortical morphometry pipeline in 30 typically developing fetuses [22-36 weeks gestational age (GA)]. For each subject, two disjoint subsets of 2D T2-weighted stacks (no shared stacks) were independently reconstructed into 3D volumes using the Neural Slice-to-Volume Reconstruction (NeSVoR) and the Slice-to-Volume Reconstruction Toolkit (SVRTK). Cortical plate volume, surface area, mean sulcal depth, and absolute mean curvature were extracted, and measurement reliability was assessed using absolute percent difference (APD) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Multiple linear regression evaluated the effects of mean stack quality, quality difference between subsets, stack count, and GA on measurement reliability. Results: NeSVoR-derived metrics showed high reliability for all measures (mean APD < 3%, ICC > 0.99). SVRTK-derived metrics were also robust (mean APD < 5%, ICC > 0.97). Reliability increased with greater stack count and older GA in NeSVoR, and with higher mean stack quality in SVRTK. Discussion: These results demonstrate that automated cortical morphometry from fetal MRI yields highly consistent measurements of volumetric and surface metrics within the proposed within-session design, once minimum levels of image quality and stack count are met. This study proposes a within-session benchmark for automated fetal cortical measurements and underscores that systematic reliability assessment is essential for confident application of automated pipelines in fetal neuroimaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.