SynthesisFrontiers in public health2026
Arts on prescription for wellbeing in adults: systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cultural Prescribing: Concepts, Evidence, Implementation, and the Contribution of Socially Engaged Art.Yonago acta medica · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Arts on Prescription is a social prescribing model in which health professionals refer adults to community-based artistic activities led by artists or musicians, with the goal of promoting wellbeing and mental health. This systematic review aimed to investigate whether Arts on Prescription improves wellbeing and reduces symptoms of depression and anxiety. Methods: PubMed, PsycINFO and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched in November 2024, following a previously developed search strategy. The selection of studies, quality assessment and data extraction were carried out independently by two authors. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. We included randomised control trials, quasi-experimental studies, observational studies and mixed-methods studies assessing the impact of art programmes prescribed by a health professional on adults' wellbeing and symptoms of depression and anxiety. A narrative synthesis of the results was carried out. Results: Of the 3,561 unique citations obtained, six studies met the inclusion criteria. Analysis of the reference lists of the included studies revealed two additional pertinent studies. Five of the studies were quasi-experimental studies and three were observational studies. The sample size ranged from 12 to 1,297 participants, with an average age ranging from 43 to over 80 years old. In all studies, an improvement in wellbeing was reported following participation in Arts on Prescription programmes. Evidence regarding depression and anxiety was limited to one study, which reported statistically significant but clinically modest reductions in both outcomes. Discussion: Arts on Prescription programmes were consistently associated with improvements in wellbeing across a range of populations and settings. Preliminary evidence suggests potential benefits for depression and anxiety that warrant investigation in more rigorous study designs. Further studies are needed to overcome the limitations of the analysed studies, such as the lack of control groups, small and non-representative samples, and short follow-up periods. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024572685, identifier CRD42024572685.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.