ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Weekly work hours and cervical spine dysfunction among video display terminal workers: mediating roles of occupational stress and sleep quality.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cervical spine dysfunction is common among video display terminal (VDT) workers. Although long work hours have been linked to musculoskeletal problems, how extended work hours relate to cervical spine dysfunction via psychosocial and behavioral factors remains insufficiently characterized. We examined the association between weekly work hours and cervical spine dysfunction and explored the potential mediating roles of occupational stress and sleep quality. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 929 VDT workers from 10 companies in Shenzhen, China. Cervical spine dysfunction was assessed using the Neck Disability Index and dichotomized as dysfunction (NDI > 4) versus no dysfunction (NDI ≤ 4). Weekly work hours were categorized as ≤40, 41-48, 49-56, and ≥57 h/week. Occupational stress was measured using the Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ-22) and defined as a demand-control ratio >1. Sleep quality was assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and categorized as poor (PSQI >5) versus good (PSQI ≤5). Multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for prespecified confounders were used. Mediation analyses were conducted using single- and parallel-mediator models; 5,000 bootstrap resamples were used for single-mediator models. Results: Longer weekly working hours were associated with higher odds of cervical spine dysfunction (adjusted ORs 2.10-2.70 vs. ≤ 40 h/week; all Conclusion: Longer weekly work hours were associated with higher odds of cervical spine dysfunction among VDT workers. This association may be partly explained through indirect pathways involving occupational stress and sleep quality, supporting prevention strategies integrating working-time management with ergonomic/posture interventions, stress reduction, and sleep health promotion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.