Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42305738›Full record

ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2026

Safety of Augmentation Mastopexy in a Teaching Environment: Complication Analysis.

Francesco Marena, Aline Carrer Bortolini, Alcemar Maia Souto, Farid Hakme, Tito Brambullo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aline Carrer Bortolini
Alcemar Maia Souto
Farid Hakme
Tito Brambullo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Breast hypoplasia and ptosis, whether congenital or acquired, may significantly affect body image and quality of life. Augmentation mastopexy is an effective corrective procedure but is technically demanding and associated with a recognized risk of complications, raising concerns regarding its role in surgical training. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and type of complications following augmentation mastopexy performed by plastic surgery residents under direct attending supervision and to assess the implications for training within an academic setting. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 289 consecutive augmentation mastopexy procedures performed between January 2020 and January 2024, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. All procedures were performed by residents under the continuous supervision of experienced plastic surgeons. Data regarding patient characteristics, surgical technique, implant selection, and postoperative complications were collected and analyzed. Results: Forty-six complications were recorded, corresponding to an overall complication rate of 15.9%. Minor complications included suture dehiscence (4.84%), secondary ptosis (3.4%), asymmetry (3.11%), hematoma (1.3%), and seroma (1.3%). Major complications included capsular contracture (0.7%) and infection (1.0%). Reoperations were primarily required for major complications or patient-reported aesthetic dissatisfaction. Overall outcomes were comparable to those reported in the literature. Conclusions: Within a structured academic program with direct attending supervision, augmentation mastopexy can be safely performed by residents, achieving complication rates comparable to published data. These findings support the role of supervised augmentation mastopexy as a valuable component of plastic surgery training. Level of Evidence 4 Risk:

Identifiers

PMID42305738
PMCPMC13267641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.