ArticleIJTLD open2026
National TB cohort review evaluation: insights for control strategies in low-incidence settings.
Article in IJTLD open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTB cohort review is a structured clinical audit of case management and epidemiological data. In 2012, Wales (UK) implemented a national cohort review programme to improve clinical outcomes and enhance public health surveillance.
methodsRetrospective population-based cohort analysis of care quality outcomes for all notified TB cases in Wales (2012-2022). Adjusted regression modelling assessed temporal trends post-implementation and compared outcomes of cases presented at TB cohort review with those not presented.
resultsOf the 1,175 notified TB cases over the study period, 985 (83.1%) were presented at cohort review. Many case management outcomes achieved near-target thresholds. Adherence support was increasingly targeted at index cases with social complexity and higher transmission risk, alongside substantial improvements in the completeness of surveillance data. Persistent programmatic challenges in contact identification and assessment were identified.
conclusionAs countries approach pre-elimination thresholds, TB services must ensure rigorous surveillance data collection and targeting of limited resources to populations at greatest risk of transmission and non-completion of treatment. Since implementing a national TB cohort review in Wales, there have been significant post-implementation improvements in care outcomes. This provides a robust, resource-efficient framework for TB control that could be applied to other similarly resourced low-incidence countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.