ArticleIJTLD open2026
Scoping review of community-wide screening to break the chain of TB transmission.
Article in IJTLD open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundActive screening for TB may help address the global TB burden, but the optimal screening strategies are not defined. We have reviewed the effectiveness of community-wide active screening programmes to assess the characteristics associated with a reduction in TB.
methodsWe performed a scoping review of community-wide screening studies since 1945 and summarised those that either provided TB prevalence data at the start and end of screening or compared the screening programme to a control community where screening was not performed.
resultsEight studies were identified in China, Czechoslovakia, Kenya, Malawi, South Africa, Uganda, Vietnam, Zambia, and Zimbabwe. Initial TB prevalence ranged from 84/100,000 to 1,014/100,000. Five studies demonstrated TB prevalence reductions from 44% to >80%, one showed evidence both for and against reduction, and two failed to demonstrate reduction. The successful studies were those that found, over the duration of the multi-year intervention, between 124% and 252% of the number of people with TB estimated to have been in the population at the beginning of the intervention, while unsuccessful studies found only 69%-83%.
conclusionReducing the force of infection can be accomplished by performing multiple cycles of community-wide screening to reach substantial numbers of community members with TB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.