Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42305720›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2026

Beyond biomedical interventions: social vaccinology as a framework for vaccination policy and public governance.

Jose Tuells

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jose TuellsSchool of Health Sciences, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Elche 03203, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1159-429X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the extraordinary scientific success of vaccines, vaccination policy continues to struggle to sustain public trust, legitimacy, and consistent uptake in many contemporary societies. Policy responses to these challenges frequently prioritize communication strategies, behavioral interventions, or stronger implementation, implicitly treating vaccination as a primarily biomedical intervention whose effectiveness depends on evidence dissemination and administrative execution. This article argues that such approaches overlook a structural limitation within vaccinology itself: the lack of an explicit framework to address vaccination as a social process embedded in public life. We propose a tripartite model distinguishing basic vaccinology, programmatic vaccinology, and social vaccinology. Social vaccinology is defined as the domain concerned with individual and collective behaviors arising from the interaction between policy design, social influences, ethical considerations, institutional trust, and public discourse. Recognizing social vaccinology does not replace scientific evidence or programmatic delivery but complements them by clarifying the social conditions under which vaccination policies succeed or fail. By reframing vaccination as both a technical and a governance challenge, this article offers a conceptual framework to support more socially robust and sustainable vaccination policies.

Indexed as

governance frameworkshealth communicationhealth policyimmunization programspolicy implementationpublic governancepublic trustsocial determinantssocial vaccinologyvaccination policyvaccination uptakevaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID42305720
PMCPMC13268770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.