Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42305717›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2026

Prescription stimulant consumption in the United States compared with 35 other countries.

Marcus A Bachhuber, Ashly E Jordan, Brian J Piper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marcus A BachhuberCenter for Evidence-Based Policy, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, United States.
Ashly E JordanNew York State Office of Addiction Services and Supports, New York, NY 12203, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9426-2869
Brian J PiperDepartment of Medical Education, Geisinger College of Health Science, Scranton, PA 18509, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2295-445X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Previous studies have identified the United States as a global outlier in stimulant prescribing. Given that stimulant prescribing in the United States has continued to increase, we aimed to provide current international comparisons. Methods: We analyzed 2024 stimulant consumption data from the International Narcotics Control Board, reported as defined daily doses for statistical purposes (S-DDD) per 1000 population per day. We compared the United States with 35 Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development members. Results: Overall, the United States comprised 26.8% of the population and consumed 67.6% of prescription stimulants. Per 1000 population per day, the United States had the second highest prescription stimulant consumption after Iceland. The volume of prescription stimulants consumed in the United States per 1000 population per day was 569% of the mean of comparison countries. Further, only 31.2% of consumed prescription stimulants in the United States was methylphenidate, vs 88.8% in comparison countries. Conclusion: Additional research is needed on the clinical and public health consequences of these major differences in controlled substance policy and clinical practice between the United States and other countries. For example, findings suggest a need to better understand any differential addictive potential of prescription stimulant regimens.

Indexed as

ADHDamphetaminesmethylphenidatepharmaceutical policy

Identifiers

PMID42305717
PMCPMC13268762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.