Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42305715›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2026

Drivers of frontline registered nurse turnover: evidence from the 2022 National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses.

Amy Witkoski Stimpfel, Nikhil S Padhye, Alberta K Tran, Maja Djukic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amy Witkoski StimpfelRory Meyers College of Nursing, NewYork University, New York, NY 10010, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5724-0601
Nikhil S PadhyeJane and Robert Cizik School of Nursing, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5738-7486
Alberta K TranMedStar Health Research Institute, 10980 Grantchester Way, Columbia, MD 21044, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9091-7036
Maja DjukicJane and Robert Cizik School of Nursing, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on the nursing workforce persist. Methods: We analyzed the latest National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses data to identify the drivers of actual, self-reported turnover among 8953 frontline registered nurses using multivariable regression. Results: The turnover rate was 28.7%. Nurses dissatisfied with their primary position were over 2.5 times more likely to turnover. Nurses enrolled in school or holding graduate degrees demonstrated higher actual turnover rates, likely due to the incompatibility of rigid work schedules with academic demands and increased marketability. Participation in a labor union/collective bargaining participation was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of nurses' turnover. Conclusion: Our findings identify immediate policy levers-such as flexible or nontraditional scheduling options-that organizations can deploy to improve job satisfaction and work-life balance and curb costly turnover.

Indexed as

COVID-19health workforcenursing

Identifiers

PMID42305715
PMCPMC13268764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.