ArticleHealth affairs scholar2026
Paid time off and cardiovascular disease events: the Health and Retirement Study, 2010-2022.
Article in Health affairs scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The United States does not guarantee universal access to employer-based paid time off. Several studies demonstrate the relationship between workplace benefits and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. The objective of our analysis was to evaluate the relationship between access to employer-based paid time off and the risk of incident CVD events in a sample of working older adults in the United States. Methods: Our sample consisted of 5604 persons aged 50 years and older from the 2010 and 2016 longitudinal prospective cohorts of the Health and Retirement Study, a nationwide US sample. Our exposure was whether participants had access to employer-based paid time-off benefits at baseline. Our outcome was incident CVD events, including myocardial infarctions, strokes, and transient ischemic attacks. We compared rates of CVD events among persons with and without benefits. Results: 81.5% of our sample had paid time-off benefits. In adjusted models, persons with access to paid time-off benefits had a 32% lower risk of a CVD event over 6-14 years (mean: 7.5 years) of follow-up (hazard ratio: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.49, 0.94). Conclusion: Paid time-off benefits were associated with a reduced risk of CVD events among older adults in the United States.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.