ArticleRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2026
[Governance, organization, and task distribution in family planning in Latin America and the CaribbeanGovernança, organização e distribuição de tarefas no planejamento familiar na América Latina e no Caribe].
Article in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To provide a comparative description of governance, service organization, and task distribution in family planning in countries of Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), by level of care and subregion. Methods: An observational, cross-sectional comparative study conducted in 2025 through a survey sent to ministries of health in LAC countries with Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) offices. The study analyzed (1) the governance and organization of family planning services and (2) task distribution. Comparisons between care levels were performed using the Skillings-Mack and Wilcoxon tests, and comparisons between groups were performed using Fisher's exact test (p <0.05) using Stata v.19. Results: Responses were received from 22 of 29 countries (75.9%). Of those, 20 (90.9%) reported having family planning policies and 16 (72.7%) reported having quality assurance systems. The availability of modern contraceptive methods showed an upward trend across levels of care, from community-based services to hospitals (p <0.001). On average, countries reported that 9 of 11 modern contraceptive methods were available at least at one level. The main differences among countries were in long-acting reversible methods. The authority to provide modern contraceptive methods was largely limited to medical professionals. Conclusions: Family planning in LAC is highly regulated, although gaps remain in quality assurance, service organization across levels of care, and the distribution of tasks among different health professionals. Strengthening it requires better coordination between regulation, service organization, and task distribution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.