ArticleInnovative surgical sciences2026
Microsurgical training on non-living models: proposal for basic training.
Article in Innovative surgical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Microsurgery is an essential skill for plastic surgeons and a basic microsurgical course should be integrated into all plastic surgery residents' training programs, as mastering this technique cannot be reached only through observation and requires regular practice. Despite living models better simulate reality, non-living models have been shown to be valid tools for basic/intermediate microsurgical training. While many single preclinical exercises are described in the literature, there is lack of proposals for a complete basic program on non-living models. The aim of this study is to propose a basic microsurgical program entirely based on non-living models and to evaluate its feasibility with a cross-sectional study that analyses the outcomes of its application via the "Queen Mary University London microsurgery global rating scale" scoring system. Methods: Nine different exercises for microsurgical training on non-living models were chosen based on a literature review. A basic step-by-step microsurgical training program was built. The program was proposed to the Plastic Surgery residents of our unit through a five-day training, during 2020-2023. No participants 'selection was made. All participants were examined with a practical test before and after the proposed program. The results of pre- and post-training test were collected and analysed. Results: Each trainee was able to complete a posterior-wall-first technique end-to-end anastomosis on the chicken thigh femoral artery with no major mistakes at the end of the program. Moreover, the data analysis revealed a statistically significant improvement of each evaluated skill after the training. Conclusions: The proposed basic program is easy to organize and allows the trainee to develop the basic microsurgical skills needed to move to advanced training on living animals or on guided clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.