ArticleInnovative surgical sciences2026
Effectiveness and feasibility of short-course simulator training for robotic surgery novices - a randomized controlled trial (FastSim trial).
Article in Innovative surgical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: As robot-assisted surgery (RAS) is on the rise, feasible and effective simulator training for surgical residents is needed. This study compares the effectiveness and feasibility of two compact simulator training protocols on the DaVinci skills simulator (dVSS) for preparing robotic surgery novices. Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, RAS novices were randomized 1:1 into a conventional group (Control), including four repetitions of five simulator exercises in two sessions, and a fast group (Fast), with two repetitions of the same five simulator exercises in a single training session. The primary endpoint was the mean efficiency score achieved in the final exercise. Results: Fifty-two participants (22 males) were randomized, 26 in each group. Forty-eight per cent were between 30 and 50 years old and most of the participants were residents (44.2 %) or consultants (42.3 %), 13.5 % were students. The primary endpoint results showed a mean efficiency score of 48.2 ± 26.7 (Fast) vs. 52.3 ± 30.4 (Control) in the intention-to-treat analysis (p=0.527). The most significant improvement in efficiency and penalty scores was observed between the 1st and 4th repetitions in the control group. Participants over 50 years old and consultants performed worse than younger participants, students and resident doctors. Participants interested in robotic surgery outperformed those with little or no interest. Conclusions: A training of 10-20 exercises on the dVSS with ascending levels is insufficient to succeed in complex simulation exercises but improves performance and motivation. These findings emphasize the need for tailored training programs and continuous skill development in robotic surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.