ArticleInnovative surgical sciences2026
Vascular considerations in autologous breast reconstruction using DIEP or MS-TRAM flaps: standard techniques, alternatives, and rescue strategies.
Article in Innovative surgical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Microsurgical breast reconstruction is an established method following mastectomy; however, various factors significantly influence the complication rate. This analysis evaluates the impact of vascular anastomosis techniques, previous surgeries, and radiotherapy on the success rate of microsurgical breast reconstruction. Methods: In a retrospective data analysis of 396 patients who underwent 447 flap procedures (single or bilateral microsurgical breast reconstruction) using tissue from the lower abdomen (either DIEP or MS-TRAM flaps), the type of venous and arterial anastomoses, the initial findings or surgical specifics at the thoracic recipient site and their influence on complications were examined. Results: Anastomosing two veins per flap did not result in a significant reduction of major complications. Flap loss was significantly more common when standard venous anastomosis to the internal mammary vein was not used, underscoring their role as the preferred recipient vessels. No major complications were observed in patients receiving a caudal anastomosis to the internal mammary artery. Patients with prior radiotherapy exhibited an increased need for arterial revisions. All documented seromas and infections occurred in irradiated patients. Conclusions: A differentiated surgical plan that considers optimal anastomosis techniques, supercharging strategies, and individual risk factors is crucial to reducing complications. Further studies are needed to optimize patient-specific strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.