ArticleInnovative surgical sciences2026
Hot water bottle burn injuries: a 10-year retrospective analysis of incidence and potential predictors in Germany.
Article in Innovative surgical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Hot water bottles are widely used for warmth and therapeutic relief, but improper use can lead to burns, ranging from superficial to full-thickness skin injuries. Following the natural gas shortage caused by the complete halt of Russian gas supplies, European countries experienced a sharp increase in hot water bottle-related burns. However, data for Germany were not yet provided. This study examines the incidence of hot water bottle burns over a 10-year period, exploring potential correlations with natural gas prices, natural gas consumption, ambient temperature, and respiratory infection rates. Methods: A retrospective single-center analysis of 88 patients who sustained hot water bottle burns from 2014 to 2024 was conducted. Patient data, including burn severity and demographic information, were extracted from hospital records. Monthly counts of acute respiratory infections (ARIs), ambient temperature, natural gas price and gas consumption data were also analyzed. A Poisson regression model was applied to assess the association between hot water bottle burns and the mentioned independent variables. Results: The majority of burns (81.8 %) were second-degree injuries, primarily affecting women (81.8 %). Burns were most common on the lower trunk, thighs, and forearms. The Poisson regression model revealed that for every 1 °C increase in ambient temperature, the incidence of burns decreased by 7 % (IRR=0.93, 95 % CI: 0.88-0.97). However, no significant association was found between ARI incidence, natural gas price and burn occurrence. There was no significant increase of water bottle burns during the recent European energy crisis in Germany. Conclusions: Hot water bottle burns are more frequent during colder months, particularly among women. Natural gas price or natural gas consumption seems like not playing an equivalent role in Germany as in other European countries. Public health efforts should focus on education and prevention strategies to reduce these preventable injuries. Further research should explore additional factors that may influence burn rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.