ArticleNursing research and practice2026
Identification of Peristomal Skin Alterations Using Convolutional Artificial Neural Networks.
Article in Nursing research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identification of Peristomal Skin Alterations Using Convolutional Artificial Neural Networks.Nursing research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Peristomal skin complications (PSCs) are very common among ostomy patients and significantly affect their quality of life and healthcare costs. Although convolutional neural networks (CNNs) offer possibilities for automated diagnosis, specific AI applications for the treatment of PSCs are underdeveloped. Aims: To develop and validate preliminary models based on CNNs for the binary classification of peristomal skin, enabling the distinction between healthy tissue and the presence of skin lesions, thereby laying the foundations for automated diagnostic systems. Design: Prospective study. Methods: The data and images were collected by 24 stoma nurses from 17 hospitals participating in the study. We addressed the classification of peristomal skin images using state-of-the-art pretrained CNNs. The classification models were evaluated using the measures accuracy, F1-score, and the area under the ROC curve. Finally, the Grad-Cam explainability algorithm is applied to the best model. Results: With 1165 images collected, several models were tested. The data were split using standard 10-fold cross-validation. A dual experiment was conducted. First, a standard data split was employed, yielding an accuracy of 0.889, an F1-score of 0.890, and an area under the ROC curve of 0.924 for the best model. Second, the data were split so that images from the same patient would not be distributed across the training and test subsets, thereby preventing data leakage. The best results for this experiment were 0.778, 0.868, and 0.653, respectively. Conclusions: By processing peristomal skin images with artificial intelligence, we developed robust, reliable, preliminary models for detecting peristomal skin alterations. The models allow the automatic detection of any peristomal skin involvement. The automatic detection of peristomal skin changes using a photograph enables remote care and speeds up treatment. Clinical relevance: The model developed using convolutional artificial neural networks is robust and reliable for detecting alterations in the peristomal skin, representing a significant advance in peristomal skin care for all ostomates, with early detection, prevention of complications and cost savings in treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.