Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42305646›Full record

ArticleNursing research and practice2026

Identification of Peristomal Skin Alterations Using Convolutional Artificial Neural Networks.

Isabel María López-Medina, César Hueso-Montoro, Francisco Charte-Ojeda, Carmen Álvarez-Nieto, José Pablo Soriano-Torres, Francisco Pedro García-Fernández, Concepción Capilla-Díaz, Ana Carmen Montesinos-Gálvez, Noelia Moya-Muñoz, Claudia Cuevas-Sánchez and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Isabel María López-MedinaDepartment of Nursing, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain, ujaen.es.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3437-9229
César Hueso-MontoroDepartment of Nursing, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain, ujaen.es.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1515-3870
Francisco Charte-OjedaIT Department, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain, ujaen.es.
Carmen Álvarez-NietoDepartment of Nursing, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain, ujaen.es.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0913-7893
José Pablo Soriano-TorresIT Department, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain, ujaen.es.
Francisco Pedro García-FernándezDepartment of Nursing, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain, ujaen.es.
Concepción Capilla-DíazDepartment of Nursing, University of Granada, Granada, Spain, ugr.es.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3361-8718
Ana Carmen Montesinos-GálvezClinical Management Unit for General Surgery, Gastroenterology and Liver Transplantation, Regional University Hospital, Málaga, Spain.
Noelia Moya-MuñozNeurotrauma ICU, Virgen de Las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain, hvn.es.
Claudia Cuevas-SánchezPhD School, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain, ujaen.es.
María Dolores Pérez-GodoyIT Department, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain, ujaen.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Peristomal skin complications (PSCs) are very common among ostomy patients and significantly affect their quality of life and healthcare costs. Although convolutional neural networks (CNNs) offer possibilities for automated diagnosis, specific AI applications for the treatment of PSCs are underdeveloped. Aims: To develop and validate preliminary models based on CNNs for the binary classification of peristomal skin, enabling the distinction between healthy tissue and the presence of skin lesions, thereby laying the foundations for automated diagnostic systems. Design: Prospective study. Methods: The data and images were collected by 24 stoma nurses from 17 hospitals participating in the study. We addressed the classification of peristomal skin images using state-of-the-art pretrained CNNs. The classification models were evaluated using the measures accuracy, F1-score, and the area under the ROC curve. Finally, the Grad-Cam explainability algorithm is applied to the best model. Results: With 1165 images collected, several models were tested. The data were split using standard 10-fold cross-validation. A dual experiment was conducted. First, a standard data split was employed, yielding an accuracy of 0.889, an F1-score of 0.890, and an area under the ROC curve of 0.924 for the best model. Second, the data were split so that images from the same patient would not be distributed across the training and test subsets, thereby preventing data leakage. The best results for this experiment were 0.778, 0.868, and 0.653, respectively. Conclusions: By processing peristomal skin images with artificial intelligence, we developed robust, reliable, preliminary models for detecting peristomal skin alterations. The models allow the automatic detection of any peristomal skin involvement. The automatic detection of peristomal skin changes using a photograph enables remote care and speeds up treatment. Clinical relevance: The model developed using convolutional artificial neural networks is robust and reliable for detecting alterations in the peristomal skin, representing a significant advance in peristomal skin care for all ostomates, with early detection, prevention of complications and cost savings in treatment.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceconvolutional neural networksperistomal skinstoma nurse

Identifiers

PMID42305646
PMCPMC13266281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.