ReviewUrban informatics2026
Controlled environment agriculture as urban infrastructure: advancing a public agenda for spatial equity.
Review in Urban informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Controlled Environment Agriculture (CEA) has emerged as a high-tech solution to urban food security. However, its development has largely been driven by venture capital and profit-maximizing imperatives, resulting in limited CEA scalability, narrow crop diversity, and minimal engagement with issues of spatial equity-defined here as the fair distribution of food infrastructure across urban geographies. This Perspective calls for a paradigm shift: positioning CEA not as a standalone technological fix, but as a component of urban infrastructure that integrates into urban systems to deliver co-benefits for food justice, public health, and environmental resilience. We argue that the public value of CEA should be a central aim of CEA deployment, guiding both research and planning agendas. To advance this vision, we highlight the potential of Geospatial Artificial Intelligence (GeoAI) and High-Performance Computing (HPC) as underexplored tools to enable adaptive crop management, site-specific decision support, and identify underserved communities for targeted interventions. When combined with urban informatics approaches, these technologies can help embed CEA within inclusive, data-informed, and climate-resilient city systems. We conclude by outlining priorities for a public-interest CEA agenda that aligns with sustainable urban development and spatial justice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.