Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42305582›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Distinct temporal patterns of beta bursts differentiate successful and failed movement cancellation.

Eunseo Oh, Yang Seok Cho, Sung-Phil Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eunseo OhDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan, South Korea.
Yang Seok ChoSchool of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.
Sung-Phil KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beta bursts, transient increases in beta-band activity in the brain, have been implicated in action stopping. However, it remains unclear how their temporal dynamics directly map onto the stop process. By analyzing human electroencephalography (EEG) recordings from the stop-signal task, we found that after the stop signal, frontal beta burst rates increased earlier when movement was successfully canceled than when it was not. Temporal decoding and low-dimensional neural trajectory analyses further corroborated this finding, showing that multi-channel beta burst patterns diverged between stop and go trials earlier for successful than failed stops. While averaging burst rates over a wide window from stop-signal presentation to stop-signal reaction time (SSRT) obscured these dynamics, narrowing window near SSRT uncovered clearer neural signatures of inhibitory control. Notably, traditional beta amplitudes did not capture the timing differences observed in beta bursts. Overall, beta burst dynamics suggest that stop process onset timings may underlie behavioral variability in movement cancellation.

Indexed as

Behavioral neuroscienceCognitive neuroscienceNeuroscience

Identifiers

PMID42305582
PMCPMC13267702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.