ArticleiScience2026
Signal brevity and compression in loud calls of the white-headed langur.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Zipf's law of brevity and Menzerath's law are linguistic principles, predicting that coding length is minimized for optimal coding efficiency. We tested whether two linguistic laws apply to vocal communication of white-headed langurs inhabiting karst forests. Adult male white-headed langurs produce three loud call types in long-distance sequences. Frequent call types were shorter in duration, supporting Zipf's law of brevity. Patterns related to Menzerath's law were more nuanced. Inter-call intervals shortened in longer sequences, but only wahoo calls showed duration compression. Physiological constraints caused calls to shorten and intervals to lengthen later in sequences. Longer sequences contained proportionally more short snorts and fewer long roars and wahoos. Signal compression reflects a trade-off between energy cost and communication efficiency. Constant durations of snorts and roars may aid long-distance transmission and caller recognition. These findings provide evidence for signal brevity and compression under physiological limits, offering insights into vocal communication evolution in non-human primates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.