ArticleOrthopedic reviews2026
Nerve Injuries After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Article in Orthopedic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Nerve injury is an uncommon but clinically meaningful complication following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Reported incidences vary widely across the literature, and the specific patterns, predictors, and recovery trajectories remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the prevalence, types, risk factors, management approaches, and recovery outcomes of nerve injuries after TKA. Methods: A comprehensive search identified eight eligible studies reporting postoperative nerve injuries following primary or revision TKA. Data extracted included patient demographics, surgical and perioperative characteristics, nerve injury types, management strategies, and recovery outcomes. Random-effects models were used to pool incidence and recovery proportions. Meta-regression evaluated demographic and procedural predictors, while sensitivity analyses assessed robustness. Publication bias was examined using funnel-plot visualization. Results: Across 1,599,948 TKAs, 4,746 nerve injury events were identified. The pooled incidence was highly variable, with a random-effects estimate of 12.86% and substantial heterogeneity (I² = 99.6%). The common peroneal nerve accounted for the majority of injuries, while tibial, femoral, sciatic, and saphenous nerve injuries were less frequent. Demographic factors such as age, sex, BMI, comorbidities, and preoperative deformity were not significant predictors (p > 0.05). Among procedural factors, only tourniquet use was significantly associated with increased nerve injury risk (p = 0.0136). Overall recovery was favorable, with a pooled recovery rate of 73% (I² = 86.4%). Time to full recovery ranged from approximately 10 to 22 months. Conservative management was the mainstay, with selective surgical intervention for compressive etiologies. Funnel-plot asymmetry suggested potential publication bias. Conclusion: Nerve injury after TKA remains uncommon but clinically significant, with the common peroneal nerve most frequently affected. Tourniquet use appears to be the key modifiable risk factor. Most patients recover function, though recovery may be prolonged. Further standardized prospective research is needed to refine prevention and management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.