ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
An explainable prognostic prediction panel for sepsis based on serum amino acid profiles.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sepsis is a life-threatening syndrome requiring aggressive management, and novel noninvasive biomarkers to enable high-confidence risk stratification of sepsis and to predict sepsis-related outcomes are urgently needed. Methods: Quantitative (liquid chromatography) mass spectrometry was used to compare the abundance of serum amino acids between patients with sepsis and healthy controls (HC) to characterize alterations in amino acid profiles associated with sepsis. In addition, multiple machine learning (ML) methods were applied to construct a prognostic prediction model for patients with sepsis. The predictive performance was assessed, and the feature contributions were screened, followed by the development of an explainable prognostic prediction panel for sepsis. Results: Sixty participants in the HC group and 172 patients in the sepsis group (82 patients with septic shock) were included in this study. A discernible difference in the amino acid profiles between the HC and sepsis groups was detected, and the abundance of amino acids differed significantly among the HC, septic shock, and non-septic shock groups, indicating that amino acids could differentiate patients with sepsis from the HC group with good diagnostic performance. Then, 172 patients in the sepsis group were assigned to training and validation sets, and 130 patients with sepsis in the external test set were included. Five ML models (deephit, piecewise constant hazard, probability mass function, resource selection function, and extreme gradient boosting) were subsequently used, and the deephit model was selected according to the greater area under the curve and clinical benefits in the training, validation, and test sets. In the process of reducing features on the basis of feature importance rankings, the Deephit model, which is based on five features, had the best ability to predict survival probability, and an optimized Deephit model, which involves screening five features, namely, glutamine, glycine, lysine, pyroglutamic acid and proline, was successfully developed to predict the prognostic risk probability for patients with sepsis. Conclusions: Collectively, our findings demonstrated that alterations in serum amino acid profiles distinguish patients with sepsis from HCs and are strongly associated with clinical outcomes, supporting their utility as candidate features for prognostic prediction models in sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.