ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
From monoclonals to bispecific T cell engagers: the evolving antibody-based therapy landscape in acute myeloid leukemia.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive hematological malignancy with a poor prognosis despite advances in treatment strategies. Standard treatment regimens induce remissions in many patients, but relapse occurs in approximately half, highlighting the urgent need for novel therapeutic strategies. Antibody-based therapies have significantly improved the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), but progress in AML has been slower, with only gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) receiving FDA approval to date. This is largely due to the absence of AML-specific surface antigens and the challenge of distinguishing malignant blasts from normal hematopoietic cells, which raises concerns about on-target/off-leukemia toxicity. Nonetheless, a wide range of antibody constructs, including unconjugated monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, and bispecific T cell engagers (BTCEs), are now under investigation in both preclinical studies and clinical trials, predominantly in the relapsed/refractory (R/R) setting. Encouraging results from early-phase studies suggest that antibody-based approaches could complement or even partially replace traditional cytotoxic regimens in selected patient groups. In this review, we summarize the spectrum of antigenic targets explored for AML immunotherapy, critically assess clinical outcomes achieved so far, and discuss current efforts to improve efficacy, durability, and safety. We also highlight emerging strategies aimed at overcoming antigen heterogeneity and resistance, thereby advancing antibody-based therapies toward broader clinical application in AML.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.