ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Clinical heterogeneity and treatment optimization in anti-KLHL11 encephalitis: two case reports and literature review.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the clinical features, differential treatment responses, and management strategies of encephalitis associated with anti-Kelch-like protein 11 (KLHL11) antibodies. Methods: We report two cases of anti-KLHL11 encephalitis that improved following immunotherapy and present a literature review of cases published in the last six years. Results: Case 1 involved a 52-year-old woman who tested positive for serum anti-KLHL11 antibodies at a 1:100 titer. The patient completely recovered following a treatment regimen comprising intravenous immunoglobulin administration at 400 mg/kg/day for 5 days, combined with low-dose rituximab (100 mg, weekly for three consecutive weeks). Extensive tumor screening revealed no underlying malignancies. In Case 2, a 65-year-old man tested positive for anti-KLHL11 antibodies in both serum (titer 1:320) and cerebrospinal fluid (titer 1:100). Initial high-dose intravenous glucocorticoid pulse therapy, starting at 1000 mg dose and tapered by halving the dose every 3 days until discontinuation, combined with low-dose rituximab (100 mg weekly for 3 consecutive weeks), resulted in a suboptimal response, with symptoms recurring after one month. Subsequent administration of efgartigimod (10 mg/kg) led to marked clinical improvement. A testicular ultrasound revealed an epididymal calcification, potentially indicating a burnt-out germ cell tumor. Conclusion: Anti-KLHL11 encephalitis exhibits considerable clinical heterogeneity. A high serum anti-KLHL11 titer (1:320) was associated with treatment refractoriness, this association is a preliminary observation that requires validation in larger cohorts. Efgartigimod appears to be a promising therapeutic option for paraneoplastic neurological syndrome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.