ReviewTranslational cancer research2026
Artificial intelligence in radiation treatment planning: a narrative review from automation to clinical decision support.
Review in Translational cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Radiation treatment planning is a complex and resource-intensive process that plays a critical role in the quality and safety of radiotherapy. Increasing treatment complexity and growing demands on clinical workflows have motivated the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) to support planning tasks. While early AI applications focused primarily on automation, recent developments have expanded their role toward clinical decision support. The objective of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of current AI applications across the treatment planning workflow and to introduce a conceptual framework that characterizes the transition from task-based automation to clinically integrated decision support. Methods: This narrative review summarizes current applications of AI in radiation treatment planning, organized by key stages of the planning workflow. We examine developments in auto-segmentation, dose prediction, automated plan generation, and plan evaluation, with a focus on clinical evidence, translational readiness, and implementation challenges. Key Content and Findings: AI-assisted contouring and knowledge-based planning represent the most mature applications and are increasingly integrated into clinical practice. Emerging AI tools support plan evaluation and optimization by providing benchmarks, exploring trade-offs, and promoting consistency across planners and institutions. Rather than replacing human expertise, these systems function most effectively as decision-support tools that augment clinical judgment. However, challenges related to data quality, generalizability, interpretability, and safety continue to limit widespread adoption. Conclusions: AI is reshaping radiation treatment planning, with a clear shift from task-level automation toward clinically integrated decision support. Responsible translation requires rigorous validation, human-centered design, and attention to equity and safety. When implemented thoughtfully, AI has the potential to enhance decision-making, reduce variability, and improve the quality and consistency of radiotherapy care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.