ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2026
African traditional medicine: historical legacy, colonial disruption, and pathways for integration into modern healthcare.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
African Traditional Medicine (ATM) remains an important component of healthcare across Africa and continues to play a significant role within pluralistic healthcare systems where traditional and biomedical practices coexist. This narrative review critically examines the historical development, ethnopharmacological relevance, scientific validation, integration models, governance frameworks, and ethical considerations surrounding ATM within contemporary African healthcare systems. A structured literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and institutional policy sources including publications from the World Health Organization (WHO), African Union (AU), and African Medicines Agency (AMA). The literature was synthesized thematically to examine historical foundations, indigenous knowledge systems, medicinal resources, clinical evidence, healthcare integration, regulation, and policy development related to ATM. The review demonstrates that ATM encompasses diverse therapeutic modalities including herbal medicine, spiritual and ritual healing, manual therapies, traditional birth attendance, and community-based preventive care. Africa's extensive medicinal biodiversity and indigenous knowledge systems provide substantial ethnopharmacological potential for natural-product research and drug discovery. However, integration of ATM into formal healthcare systems remains constrained by limited clinical validation, challenges in standardization and quality control, fragmented regulatory systems, insufficient research infrastructure, and persistent epistemological tensions between biomedical and indigenous healthcare paradigms. The review further highlights the influence of colonial disruption on the marginalization of indigenous medical knowledge and examines evolving efforts toward integration through institutional, collaborative, referral-based, and regulated product models. Regional and international governance initiatives, including WHO strategies and the African Medicines Agency, are increasingly promoting harmonized regulation, practitioner oversight, and evidence-informed integration of traditional medicine across Africa. Ultimately, effective integration of ATM requires interdisciplinary research, strengthened regulatory frameworks, ethical governance, biodiversity conservation, and equitable protection of indigenous knowledge systems. Balanced and context-specific approaches that combine scientific rigor with cultural responsiveness may contribute to safer, more inclusive, and sustainable healthcare systems within contemporary African contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.