ArticlePain reports2026
Suppression of visceral nociception by C-fiber transmission block using temporal interference sinusoidal stimulation.
Article in Pain reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Managing chronic visceral pain is challenging due to the lack of selective targeting of C-fiber nociceptors. Prior work has shown that suprathreshold dorsal root ganglia (DRG) stimulation (10-100 Hz) suppresses hypersensitivity and blocks colorectal afferent transmission through activity-dependent conduction slowing. Objective: To investigate the feasibility of temporal interference stimulation (TIS) for visceral pain management in mice. Methods: Temporal interference stimulation was delivered using 2 kilohertz-range sinusoidal currents (2,000 and 2,020 Hz) to create a 20-Hz envelope stimulus at focal regions. We utilized: (1) GCaMP6s imaging to visualize neuronal activation in the L6 DRG; (2) Single-fiber recordings to assess axonal blockade; (3) Visceromotor response (VMR) measurements to evaluate pain suppression, and (4) Immune profiling to monitor post-stimulation responses. Results: Temporal interference stimulation provided spatially adjustable activation of DRG neurons by shifting the focal interference zone. Low-frequency sinusoidal stimulation selectively blocked conduction in C-fibers and Aδ-fibers while sparing fast-conducting A-fibers. Notably, TIS reversibly suppressed VMR in both healthy and visceral hypersensitive mice. Furthermore, no immediate immune responses were detected in the DRG after treatment. Conclusion: Temporal interference stimulation on lumbosacral DRG offers a selective, spatially tunable method to block nociceptive transmission. These findings establish a robust foundation for developing TIS-based neuromodulation paradigms as a translational approach for improved chronic visceral pain management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.