Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42305412›Full record

ArticleProceedings of machine learning research2026

Perspective: Machine Learning for Health Should Consider Social Drivers of Health.

Neha Srivathsa, Sherri Rose

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of machine learning research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Neha SrivathsaDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University School of Engineering.
Sherri RoseDepartment of Health Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine.

Funding

A Framework for the Social Impact of Algorithms in Health CareDP1LM014278 · NLM · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Sherri Rose · 2022 to 2026
$5.4M
NLM NIH HHS DP1 LM014278
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical machine learning (ML) algorithms can exacerbate a wide range of injustices across multiple domains and levels of society. These harms are often underemphasized and differentially distributed, with minoritized communities disproportionately experiencing the harms and not the benefits of health ML algorithms. By proposing a correspondence between prominent algorithmic harm and social drivers of health (SDOH) frameworks, we show that a range of algorithmic harms ultimately impact human health through SDOH factors, especially structural factors. This presents an inherent tension in the development of ML for health, where the harms of algorithms may lead to the worsening of health inequities. We recommend the consideration of SDOH throughout the pipeline of ML system development for examining algorithmic harms to health. Effectively considering SDOH necessitates developing competencies in structural analysis and community-engaged approaches. Accounting for SDOH could illuminate pathways toward equity-promoting algorithms, although we highlight that, in many cases, an equity-promoting algorithm may not exist. Thus, we also emphasize the need for interventions on the root causes of health inequities.

Indexed as

algorithmic harmscommunity-engaged researchhealth inequitiesmachine learning for healthsocial drivers of healthstructural analysisstructural drivers of health

Identifiers

PMID42305412
PMCPMC13268202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.