ArticleProceedings of machine learning research2026
Perspective: Machine Learning for Health Should Consider Social Drivers of Health.
Article in Proceedings of machine learning research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Causal modeling of chronic kidney disease in a participatory framework for informing the inclusion of social drivers in health algorithms.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical machine learning (ML) algorithms can exacerbate a wide range of injustices across multiple domains and levels of society. These harms are often underemphasized and differentially distributed, with minoritized communities disproportionately experiencing the harms and not the benefits of health ML algorithms. By proposing a correspondence between prominent algorithmic harm and social drivers of health (SDOH) frameworks, we show that a range of algorithmic harms ultimately impact human health through SDOH factors, especially structural factors. This presents an inherent tension in the development of ML for health, where the harms of algorithms may lead to the worsening of health inequities. We recommend the consideration of SDOH throughout the pipeline of ML system development for examining algorithmic harms to health. Effectively considering SDOH necessitates developing competencies in structural analysis and community-engaged approaches. Accounting for SDOH could illuminate pathways toward equity-promoting algorithms, although we highlight that, in many cases, an equity-promoting algorithm may not exist. Thus, we also emphasize the need for interventions on the root causes of health inequities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42305412PMC13268202What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.