ArticleNeurosurgery practice2026
Sonolucent Cranioplasties in Young Children: Technical Nuances and Challenges.
Article in Neurosurgery practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and importanceCranioplasty, the surgical repair of cranial defects, aims to restore the structural integrity and aesthetic appearance of the skull. The choice of implant material is crucial and influenced by factors such as fit, risk of infection, and postoperative monitoring. Pediatric patients pose unique challenges in cranioplasty because of ongoing skull growth, bone resorption, and higher complication rates. This case report highlights the use of ClearFit CLINICAL PRESENTATION: A 2-year-old male patient with a traumatic brain injury and resulting sunken cranial defect underwent cranioplasty using a ClearFit implant (the youngest reported use of this technology to-date). The implant demonstrated successful integration and a favorable surgical outcome. One year after surgery, the polymethyl methacrylate-based sonolucent implant yields good clinical outcomes without postsurgical complication, allowing postoperative monitoring without radiation exposure even after fontanelle closure. When used alongside porous polyethylene strips, it may also support ongoing skull growth.
conclusionThis case supports the use of ClearFit as a viable option over traditional materials-particularly in young patients who may be at a higher risk of bone resorption with autologous grafts and will need postoperative intracranial monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.