ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2026
Biologic readiness: Improving tuberculosis screening in an adult allergy and immunology clinic.
Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In outpatient allergy settings serving historically underserved populations, compliance with Objective: We evaluated TB screening compliance among adult allergy patients receiving biologic therapy to identify workflow gaps that contribute to incomplete screening. Methods: We conducted a quality improvement project within the Division of Adult Allergy and Immunology at Maimonides Health, an urban academic medical center in Brooklyn, New York, serving a diverse patient population with significant social and medical complexity. Demographic and clinical data were collected from patients receiving biologic therapy between 2023 and 2025. TB screening completion and documentation rates were analyzed using descriptive statistics. A FOCUS-PDCA (find, organize, clarify, understand, select; plan, do, check, act) framework was applied to identify sources of process variation and to develop standardized workflow interventions. Results: Among 141 patients receiving biologic therapy, only 46.81% had documented TB screening results, leaving 53.19% without evidence of completed testing. The mean patient age was 43 years, with most patients aged between 30-44 and 45-59 years. Omalizumab (61%) and dupilumab (38%) were the most frequently prescribed biologics. Major contributors to incomplete TB screening included inconsistent documentation, lack of automated electronic medical record alerts, variable workflows across clinical sites, and patient noncompletion of laboratory testing. Conclusion: Implementing standardized TB screening workflows, improving laboratory follow-up processes, and enhancing patient education may significantly improve compliance. Targeting frequently utilized biologic therapies offers an efficient strategy for system-wide improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.