Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42305387›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Admission clinical and functional assessments for predicting inpatient fall risk using machine learning models.

Ya-Wen Lee, Ying-Lin Hsu, Shu-Mei Lai, Chih-Hao Lin, Chih-Ming Lin, Jia-Lang Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ya-Wen LeeDepartment of Administration, Lutung Christian Hospital of Changhua Christian Medical Foundation, Changhua, Taiwan.
Ying-Lin HsuDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Institute of Statistics, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Shu-Mei LaiNursing Department, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Chih-Hao LinBig Data & Digital Promotion Center, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Chih-Ming LinDepartment of Neurology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Jia-Lang XuDepartment of Applied Statistics, National Taichung University of Science and Technology, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8052-9419

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Falls are a major patient safety concern in inpatient care. This study aimed to develop machine learning models using multidimensional clinical factors to improve early identification of high-risk patients. Methods: A retrospective dataset of 483,174 adult inpatients was analyzed. Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, and Multi-Layer Perceptron were applied. Models were trained with and without SMOTENC and evaluated using five-fold cross-validation, with emphasis on AUC-ROC, recall, and F1-score. Results: Key predictors included fall history, medication use, dizziness, sensory impairment, and reduced functional status. Without SMOTENC, models achieved moderate AUC-ROC values ranging from 0.62 to 0.72, but exhibited extremely low recall and F1-scores for fall events. After applying SMOTENC, AUC-ROC remained stable in the range of 0.67 to 0.70, while recall improved substantially to approximately 50 to 60 percent. Random Forest and XGBoost demonstrated relatively stable AUC-ROC performance, whereas MLP showed limited generalization ability. Conclusions: Machine learning models can capture clinically relevant fall risk factors, with AUC-ROC indicating moderate discrimination. Severe class imbalance substantially limits minority event detection. Although SMOTENC improves recall, it introduces a precision-recall trade-off, underscoring the need to interpret AUC-ROC alongside class-specific metrics in imbalanced clinical datasets.

Indexed as

activities of daily livingfall risk predictionmachine learning modelsmulti-layer perceptronpolypharmacy

Identifiers

PMID42305387
PMCPMC13265976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.