Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42305350›Full record

ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2026

HER2-low status in breast cancer: clinicopathological factors and prognostic value.

Joanna Huszno, Zofia Kołosza, Ewa Stobiecka, Dorota Ponikiewska, Bogna Szcześniak, Jakub Simek, Ewa Chmielik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joanna HusznoMaria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Poland.
Zofia KołoszaMaria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Poland.
Ewa StobieckaMaria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Poland.
Dorota PonikiewskaMaria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Poland.
Bogna SzcześniakMaria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Poland.
Jakub SimekMaria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Poland.
Ewa ChmielikMaria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to assess the prognostic importance of HER2-low status in breast cancer (BC). Additionally, we compared the HER2-low subgroup (defined as HER2-low1+; HER2-low2+/ISH(-)) with HER2-zero and HER2-positive subgroups according to clinical, histopathological, and molecular characteristics. Material and methods: The study analyzed the medical records of BC patients treated at the National Institute of Oncology in Gliwice, Poland, between 2002 and 2018. HER2 overexpression was assessed in postoperative specimens or samples obtained via core needle biopsy. Results: Of the 657 tumors, 176 (27%) tumors were classified as HER2-low BC, 248 (38%) as HER2-zero and 233 (35%) as HER2-positive tumors. BC patients with HER2-low tumors were more likely to have hormone receptor-positive (HR+) status compared to those with HER2-zero tumors (82.4% vs. 62.1%, Conclusions: HER2-low status was associated with worse OS in breast cancer patients with certain negative prognostic factors compared with HER2-zero status. Additionally, HER2-low1+ and HER2-low2+/ISH(-) subgroups predominantly exhibited HR+ status.

Indexed as

breast cancerHER2-low statusHER2-positiveHER2-zero statusoverall survivalprognostic factors

Identifiers

PMID42305350
PMCPMC13266782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.